In the first blog post of this series, I took a closer look at what digital transformation means and outlined the areas that are crucial to address when continuously transforming business or government operations based on UXP. Today, in the third and final post, I’ll address these from the perspective of the Governing Authority and other stakeholders.
Cybernetica’s UXP is a disruptive technology that works at the heart of digital transformation projects. As pointed out in the previous blog post, the adoption of new technology can have serious implications not only on the particular practical issue that it attempts to solve, but on the whole context that the technology is embedded in.
Cybernetica’s UXP comes with the promise of facilitating data exchange between independent stakeholders in a trusted environment. The underlying technology has been lauded internationally and is considered to be the backbone of the digital transformation of the administration of the Republic of Estonia. UXP’s aspiration remains to see public or private sector clients’ digital transformation projects thrive thanks to the data exchange platform.
Kert Tali, Computer Science Master’s student at University of Tartu is the fourth recipient of Cybernetica’s Fellowship.
The Cybernetica Fellowship is a 5000-euro scholarship established in 2017, including also a paid internship at Cybernetica. The fellowship gives the laureate a unique opportunity for research collaborations in the leading R&D-based IT company in Estonia.
UXP Core release 1.14 wraps up the year 2020 for UXP product development. The release makes integration of REST services more convenient for both service providers and system integrators. It also enhances the management of UXP high availability setups for administrators.
2020 was an exceptional year. In cyberspace, however, it was business as usual with opportunistic attacks, wide attack surfaces and resilience being key in response. What we can learn from last year for 2021 writes Liisa Past, Cybernetica’s Head of Cyber Security Business Development.
When living in a society and interacting with others, we often have to prove to them who we are. We do this in order for the others to decide, whether to perform certain transactions with us, e.g., sell us something or allow us to use something. To prove who we are, we typically use our identity cards or other documents that state who we are and what we are entitled to.
The Estonian Rescue Board (ERB) registered a total of 1110 building fires in 2017 with direct damages of 7.2 million euros [1]. In 2018, a total of 50 people lost their lives in a fire and 102 were injured [2]. While the rate of fires per capita in Estonia is comparable to the Nordic countries, the rate of deadly fires is significantly higher [1]. As a part of the project “Machine learning and AI powered public service delivery”, we use machine learning methods to assess the risk scores and find significant features to help predict building fires in Estonia in order to prevent them.
The previous post addressed the legal implications of a federation of data exchange layers and introduced the Estonian-Finnish Bilateral Agreement. This last part of the blog series will take you back to State A and B and the technical issues they need to consider when federating State A’s UXP with State B’s X-Road instance.
As pointed out in the previous post, federating UXP/X-Road instances for cross-border process optimisation relies on a strong bilateral agreement between the respective Governing Authorities (GA) and other relevant governmental bodies.
